Legal Opinion
B.A.P., L.L.P. v. Pearman
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 25, 2011No. 107,747PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN F. FISCHER, Presiding Judge.
T1 Plaintiff, B.A.P., LLP. (BAP), filed this suit against Defendants Anesthesiologists of Bartlesville, P.C. (A0B), and Michael H. Pearman, M.D. Defendants responded with a motion to compel arbitration, secking to enforce an arbitration clause contained in the BAP Partnership Agreement. Defen*335dants appeal the district court's order denying their motion. We reverse and remand this case with directions to conduct an evi-dentiary hearing on defendants' motion.
BACKGROUND
T2 BAP is a limited liability partnership composed of five partners, including Michael H.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Thomson-Csf, S.A. v. American Arbitration Association, Evans & Sutherland Computer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Roby v. Corp. of Lloyd'sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- McCarthy v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Pritzker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ZolotoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- High Sierra Energy, L.P. v. HullCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- BAP, LLP v. PearmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- EXENCIAL WEALTH ADVISORS v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2024
- Hydronic Energy v. Rentzel Pump Mfg.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.