Legal Opinion
Young v. State ex rel. Department of Human Services
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 4, 2005No. 101,060PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
KENNETH L. BUETTUNER, Chief Judge.
{1 Petitioner/Appellant Proctor Andrew Young appeals the District Court's decision in Young's administrative review proceeding which challenged an order entered by Respondent/Appellee State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Human Services (DHS), establishing paternity and ordering child support. We find the administrative order is valid and free from prejudicial error and we affirm.
1 2 The paternity of three children born to Shirell Bell is at issue in this case: twin boys born June 24, 1998 and a girl born September 3, 2000. On June 25, 1998,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- City of Hugo v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- In Re 1973 John Deere 4030 TractorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Meekins v. Department of Institutions, Social & Rehabilitative ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Hill v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- ESTENSON LOGISTICS v. HOPSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- WILJO INTERIORS, INC. v. RIALSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- ESTENSON LOGISTICS v. HOPSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- HARWOOD v. ARDAGH GROUPCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- ROSE v. BERRY PLASTICS CORP.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.