Legal Opinion
Colbaugh v. Hartline
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 1994No. E011102PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs Roger D. Colbaugh, a real estate broker, and Rodney L. Niebuhr, a real estate salesperson associated with him, sued to recover a commission allegedly due them as cooperating brokers who were the procuring cause of the sale of certain real property.
After settling the case with the buyers of the property and the real estate agents who received the cooperating brokers’ commission, plaintiffs went to trial against defendants Hartline and Neville, the sellers of the property. At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case, the trial court granted defendants’…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Elrod v. Oregon Cummins Diesel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Culbertson v. RD Werner Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Wear v. CalderonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Heller v. Pillsbury Madison & SutroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Margolin v. ShemariaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Baker v. AMERICAN HORTICULTURE SUPPLY, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Williams v. City of BelvedereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.