Mackintosh-Hemphill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Palladino,
Mackintosh-Hemphill Division of G. & W. Manufacturing Company (Employer) appeals an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referees decision to reinstate benefits to John J. Banicki (Claimant). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
Claimant was employed by Employer as a molders helper. On October 16, 1981, Claimant suffered a work injury when he fell into a pit and sustained a concussion. Claimant returned to light duty work after the accident and eventually returned to his regular job on April 26, 1982.1 Claimant remained at this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bailey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- PATTERSON v. LENARTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Smith v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Byrd v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Westmoreland County Institution District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Berardelli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Dugan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Borough of Media v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- J & L Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Burger King v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.