Legal Opinion

Mackintosh-Hemphill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1988No. Appeal No. 3578 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Mackintosh-Hemphill Division of G. & W. Manufacturing Company (Employer) appeals an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referees decision to reinstate benefits to John J. Banicki (Claimant). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Claimant was employed by Employer as a molders helper. On October 16, 1981, Claimant suffered a work injury when he fell into a pit and sustained a concussion. Claimant returned to light duty work after the accident and eventually returned to his regular job on April 26, 1982.1 Claimant remained at this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. PATTERSON v. LENARTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Smith v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Byrd v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Westmoreland County Institution District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Berardelli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Dugan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Borough of Media v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. J & L Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Burger King v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API