Byrd v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
Before this Court is an appeal by James Byrd (Claimant) from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Beard) affirming a referee’s granting of Temeo Services Industries’ (Employer) petition to terminate benefits.1
Claimant fell and injured his knee while in the course of his employment on February 18, 19.77. Pursuant to a notice of compensation payable, he was granted workmen’s compensation benefits of $106.27 per week. While being treated for his knee injury, Claimant continued to limp' and complain of pain. Thus, in July of 1977 he was referred to Dr.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- PATTERSON v. LENARTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Hanyok v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Huff v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Folmer Ice Cream Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mackintosh-Hemphill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Crews v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Genuardi Supermarkets v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- MacKINTOSH-H. v. WCAB (BANICKI)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Menges v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985