Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1984No. Appeal, No. 3301 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

Before this Court is an appeal by James Byrd (Claimant) from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Beard) affirming a referee’s granting of Temeo Services Industries’ (Employer) petition to terminate benefits.1

Claimant fell and injured his knee while in the course of his employment on February 18, 19.77. Pursuant to a notice of compensation payable, he was granted workmen’s compensation benefits of $106.27 per week. While being treated for his knee injury, Claimant continued to limp' and complain of pain. Thus, in July of 1977 he was referred to Dr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. PATTERSON v. LENARTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Hanyok v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Huff v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Folmer Ice Cream Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mackintosh-Hemphill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Crews v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Genuardi Supermarkets v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. MacKINTOSH-H. v. WCAB (BANICKI)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Menges v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API