Legal Opinion

Dugan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1990PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALLADINO, Judge.

Nicholas Dugan (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed a referee’s order granting compensation beginning on the day he notified his employer, the Fuller Company of Catasauqua (Fuller), of an injury and ending on the day he retired.

On September 11, 1984, Claimant was assigned the task of clearing pieces of metal from a shop floor. After three hours of work, Claimant felt tightness and burning in his upper chest and upper abdomen. The pain gradually increased and as a result Claimant left work early. Later that night,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Scobbie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Mackintosh-Hemphill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Borough of Heidelberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API