Legal Opinion
Smith v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 20, 1985No. Appeals, Nos. 455 C.D. 1982 and 499 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Palladino,
This case presents cross-appeals by Samuel Smith (Claimant) and Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Employer) from an order of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which modified and affirmed a referee’s decision suspending a notice of compensation payable to Claimant. We affirm the Board’s order.
Claimant was employed as an assistant accounting analyst by Employer on May 4, 1977 when Claimant fell on the stairs at work and injured his back. Pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable, Claimant was paid workmen’s compensation benefits from May…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lord v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Rothery Storage & Van Co. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Coastal Tank Lines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Gunther v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Koszowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Magayna v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Universal Trucking, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Young v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Penczkowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.