Legal Opinion

City of Wilson v. Herink

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1902No. 12,905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Ellsworth district court; R. F. Thompson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J. :

The question involved in this case is whether the title of chapter 232 of the Laws of 1901 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §§2493-2500), commonly called the *608“Hurrel law,” is sufficiently expressive of the subject legislated upon in section 7 of the law. Section 7 grants authority to cities to prohibit by ordinance illegal sales of intoxicating liquors, to suppress common nuisances defined in other sections of the act, to provide by ordinance for the search of the premises where such nuisances are alleged to exist, and the seizure and destruction of all…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Weir v. County JudgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
  2. Lynch v. ChaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  3. State v. AtkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Philpin v. McCartySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  5. In Re PinkneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Amick v. FranciscoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. State v. Andrew Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Rural High School District No. 1 ex rel. Farmer v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. School District No. 3 v. AtzenweilerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API