Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Amick v. Francisco

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 7, 1916No. 21,037PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

in this action the state seeks to compel the mayor and commissioners of the city of Lawrence to issue certain bonds.

Under chapter 101 of the Laws of 1905 (Gen. Stat. 1909, •"§§ 744-747) as amended that city voted to issue bonds in the ■sum of $175,000, for the purchase of a waterworks plant. The ■defendants refused to issue the bonds, and contend, first, that there is no law providing for their issuance; second, that the •election at which they were voted was improperly conducted.

1. The defendants’ argument on their first proposition is *809tha…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gilleland v. SchuylerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Jones v. State ex rel. AtherbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
  3. State ex rel. Jackson v. DolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. State ex rel. Jackson v. PauleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. In Re PinkneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Voran v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Voran v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Bishop v. Shawnee & Mission Townships Turkey Creek Main Sewer District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. State ex rel. Griffith v. BradburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Court of Industrial Relations v. Charles Wolff Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API