Lynch v. Chase
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original Proceeding in Quo Warranto. All the material facts are stated in the opinion herein, filed June. 19, 1895.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
JoHNSTON, J. ;
This is an original proceeding in quo warranto to determine who of two contending persons is entitled to the office of warden of the state penitentiary. No controversy exists as to the facts upon which the title to the office depends, and, to facilitate the trial and secure an early decision, the facts have been embodied in the pleadings of the parties upon which the case has been submitted. J. B. Lynch, who brings the action, concedes that Seth W. Chase, the defendant, was duly appointed to the office for a term of four years, which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Donahue v. County of WillIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Conner v. . the Mayor, C. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Keenan v. PerryTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Wright v. DefreesIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- State v. McGarryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Taylor and Marshall v. BeckhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Meffert v. State Board of Medical Registration & ExaminationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Ashley v. Three Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Shade v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.