Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Boynton

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided May 13, 1933No. 1734PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOPKINS, District Judge.

This controversy involves the validity of the “Bone Dry” intoxicating liquor law of Kansas.

Plaintiff seeks a restraining order against the defendants, and asks for the assembling of a three-judge court to hear the ease on application for an interlocutory injunction.

Roland Boynton, Attorney General for Kansas, has filed a motion to dismiss the bill for want of equity and lack of jurisdiction of this court to hear the cause.

The plaintiff’s bill prays that the defendants be enjoined from enforcing the intoxicating- liquor laws of Kansas (article 21, chapter 21, of the…

2Cases cited229 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

224 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. RobasonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1941
  2. Dahlberg v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API