State v. Andrew Bros.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Hennepin county charged with the crime of unlawfully transporting one gallon of intoxicating liquor in the city of Minneapolis. Defendant demurred to the indictment. The demurrer, was overruled, Jelley, J., and at defendant’s request ten questions were certified to the supreme court as set out at the beginning of the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
The indictment charged the defendant with unlawfully transporting one gallon of intoxicating liquor in the city of Minneapolis. Defendant demurred to the indictment. The court overruled the demurrer and certified the following questions to this court:(1) Do the facts stated in said indictment constitute a public offense against the laws of the state of Minnesota?(3) Is chapter 455 of the laws of Minnesota 1919 constitutional?(3) Does the title of said act embrace more than one subject contrary to article 4, section 37, of the Constitution of Minnesota ?(4) Does the title of said act embrace…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- The Cargo of the Brig Aurora, Burn Side v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- People ex rel. Blanding v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Marks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schulte v. FitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- In Re SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re VolpiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- State v. HosmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. RudinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.