Legal Opinion

Kaehu v. Namealoha

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion'to Quasii Writ .of Error.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

ROBERTSON, C.J.

Tbe defendant moves to quash the writ of error issued in this case to the circuit court of the second circuit “for the reason that no final judgment has been entered in the above entitled cause.”

The action, which was one of ejectment, was tried in the court below jury waived. At the conclusion of the trial the judge took the case under advisement and on October 17, 1910, rendered and filed a decision holding that the plaintiff and defendant were tenants in common and that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. Thereafter plaintiff’s counsel submitted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Territory of Hawaii ex rel. Holloway v. CottonHawaii Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Cummings v. IaukeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ahin v. WidemannHawaii Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Tibbets v. PaliHawaii Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Kapepee v. KupahiHawaii Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. W. A. Ramsey, Ltd. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Territory of Hawaii v. MontgomeryHawaii Supreme Court · 1950
  3. F. E. Davis & Co. v. Illinois-Pacific Glass Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Lau v. Chang Sue Yin, Etc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Territory of Hawaii v. TamashiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API