Kapepee v. Kupahi
Hawaii Supreme Court
Error to circuit court, fifth circuit. The only error now relied on by the defendants, who are the plaintiffs in error, is that the judgment entered below is void for the reason that there was no decision in writing as required in a jury waived' case by Devised Laws, section 1747, and Maalo v. Eaiaya, 11 Haw. 705. It appears that judgment was rendered orally August 19, 1904, at the close of the trial, and that judgment was entered September 5, 1904, as of the July term,…
Read the full summary
Error to circuit court, fifth circuit. The only error now relied on by the defendants, who are the plaintiffs in error, is that the judgment entered below is void for the reason that there was no decision in writing as required in a jury waived' case by Devised Laws, section 1747, and Maalo v. Eaiaya, 11 Haw. 705. It appears that judgment was rendered orally August 19, 1904, at the close of the trial, and that judgment was entered September 5, 1904, as of the July term, 1904, this judgment being in the usual form excepting that it also sets forth various findings not usually set forth in…
1Per curiam
The statute was sufficiently complied with, and Maalo v. Kaiapa does not apply. Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Kaehu v. NamealohaHawaii Supreme Court · 1911
- Notley v. Brown ex rel. WiseHawaii Supreme Court · 1906