Legal Opinion

Shaaf v. O'Connor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1906No. Docket No. 59PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Sanilac; Beach, J. Bill by Robert Shaaf and' others against William O’Connor, trustee, and James B. Bradley, auditor general, to restrain an action of ejectment, and to quiet title. From a decree for complainants, defendant O’Connor appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Hooker, • J.

There is no substantial dispute about the facts in this case. They are as follows: In 1858, while the several parcels of land which are the subject of this litigation constituted one parcel, owned and occupied by Jarvis Hurd, a tax was levied against the land. Being returned delinquent, said Hurd caused payment to the auditor general of one-half of the tax, which payment was seasonable, and was accepted and entered upon the books of the department as payment and satisfaction for the undivided one-half of the land. Upon the tax sale the remaining one-half was offered for sale, when…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peninsular Savings Bank v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Kneeland v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hayward v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Wilkin v. KeithMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. O'Connor v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dean v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Odgers v. LentzMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Ward v. Hunter MacHinery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Farr v. NordmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Reed v. WelschMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API