Legal Opinion

Kneeland v. Wood

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1898PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Grand Traverse; Corbett, J. Ejectment by Fred A. Kneeland and John H. Cole against Lizzie C. Wood and Hiram D. Wood. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action of ejectment. Plaintiffs rely on a deed from the auditor general. The land was sold after the decree for the taxes of 1893. De*175fendants, who held the original government title, offered testimony tending to show that defendant Hiram D. Wood called at the office of the township treasurer, and was told by him, after examination, that no taxes were^ assessed on the premises in question. The circuit judge charged the jury that, if this fact was established', defendants were entitled to a verdict. The jury so found, and the plaintiffs bring error.

It is not shown that any steps had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hand v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Gould v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Loomis v. PingreeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1857
  4. Forrest v. HenrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Kinsworthy v. AustinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1861

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Palmer v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Peninsular Savings Bank v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Howard Pore, Inc. v. State Commissioner of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Roberts Tobacco Co. v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hayward v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API