Legal Opinion

Farr v. Nordman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1956No. Docket 90, Calendar 46,544PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants brought action to set aside a tax sale of 2 lots, of which they were the owners in 1947.

In December, 1947, plaintiffs received notice that the tax due on the lots amounted to $12 and, in order to avoid a further penalty of 3%, should be paid on or before January 10, 1948. Plaintiff Evelyn Farr testified that she was unable to pay the tax before the due date, but that in March, 1948, she sent to Vera Shipman, Plainfield township treasurer, a $10 bill and two $1 bills, and that she was subsequently *268advised, by Mrs. Shipman that the money had been sent to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Palmer v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Webster v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hayward v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Odgers v. LentzMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Shaaf v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Briggs Tax Service, LLC v. Detroit Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Spoon-Shacket Co. v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dean v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Reed v. WelschMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API