Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Carpenter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1906No. Docket No. 131PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Case made from Ingham; Wiest, J. Ejectment by William O’Connor against Frank L. Carpenter and others. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Carpenter appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff brought ejectment against appellant and three other defendants for an undivided half of lot 10 of Seymour’s subdivision of the S. W. \ of section 10, city of Lansing, according to plat thereof, which premises the plaintiff claims in fee. The defendant admittedly held the original government title. The plaintiff’s tax title was admittedly invalid originally because of. his failure, on making the purchase, to pay the taxes then assessed against the land.- See Hughes v. Jordan, 118 Mich. 27. The plaintiff relied upon section 143 of the tax law (Act No. 229, Pub. Acts 1897), as amended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Groesbeck v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Hughes v. JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Griffin v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Haney v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Shaaf v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Beuthien v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Fitschen v. OlsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API