Legal Opinion
Polsby v. Thompson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2002No. CIV.A. 01-323(RMU)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss; Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court upon the defendant’s renewed motion to dismiss and the pro se plaintiffs opposed motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. The plaintiff, M. Maureen Polsby, M.D., brings this action against Tommy G. Thompson in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“the defendant” or “HHS”), claiming post-employment retaliation and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Hoffmann v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Coleman v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Alford v. Providence HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Roman v. National Reconnaissance OfficeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Velikonja v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.