Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Potomac Electric Power Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 17, 2004No. CIV.A. 03-1202(RMC)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLYER, District Judge.
Elliotte Patrick Coleman complains that the Potomac Electric Power Company (“Pepeo)” violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the D.C. Human Rights Act, D.C. Code Ann. § 2-1401.01 et seq. (“DCHRA”), by continuously retaliating against him for exercising rights afforded him by law. Pepeo has filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that Mr. Coleman’s complaint was filed too late and is barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. After briefing on the motion to dismiss was completed, Mr. Coleman…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Payan v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Norden v. SamperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Coleman v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Olatunji v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Bailey v. Verizon Communications Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.