Legal Opinion
Roman v. National Reconnaissance Office
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 9, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1370PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Gilbert Roman, proceeding pro se, brings this case alleging violations of his constitutional rights in connection with the government’s processing of his requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). 1 Pending before the Court are: (1) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, (Docket No. 7), and Plaintiffs oppositions thereto (Docket Nos. 11,14,17); (2) Plaintiff’s motions for discovery (Docket Nos. 9 and 15); and (3) Plaintiffs requests to enter evidence into the record. (Docket Nos.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cofield v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ivy v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Wilfredo GONZALEZ-LORA, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DefendantDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Young-Bey v. Unity Medical HealthcareDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Baker v. Google LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.