Legal Opinion

Ohio Urology, Inc. v. Poll

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1991No. 90AP-848PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reilly, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff advances the following assignments of error:

“I. The trial court erred in denying Ohio Urology’s application for a temporary restraining order and motion for preliminary injunction.
“II. The trial court erred in dismissing Ohio Urology’s claim for declaratory judgment and specific performance of a covenant not to compete based upon the referee’s report recommending summary judgment in Dr. Poll’s favor.
“HI. The trial court erred…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Raimonde v. Van VlerahOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
  3. Rogers v. Runfola & Associates, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Karlin v. WeinbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. Levine v. BeckmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Patio Enclosures, Inc. v. HerbstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Wall v. Firelands Radiology, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Murfreesboro Medical Clinic, P.A. v. UdomTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lexis-Nexis v. BeerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API