Legal Opinion

Karlin v. Weinberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 8, 1978PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Clifford, J.

We granted certification, 75 N. J. 5 (1977), to examine the issue of whether a post-employment restrictive covenant ancillary to an employment contract between physicians is per se unreasonable and hence unenforceable, as held by the trial court. The Appellate Division reversed. Karlin v. Weinberg, 148 N. J. Super. 243 (1977). Being disinclined to adopt a per se rule, we affirm the Appellate Division and approve the longstanding case law of this State that a restrictive covenant ancillary to an *412employment contract between physicians is…

2Cited by72 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Vasquez v. Glassboro Service Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API