Legal Opinion

Patio Enclosures, Inc. v. Herbst

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 10, 2002No. 01-3674PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiff company in a dispute with a former employee who is claimed to have misused trade secrets and to have violated a covenant not to compete. Concluding that the findings of fact on which the district court based its decision are not clearly erroneous, and concluding further that the court’s denial of interlocutory injunctive relief does not represent an abuse of discretion, we shall affirm the challenged order.

I

The plaintiff, Patio Enclosures, Inc., is an Ohio corporation that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leary v. DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Friendship Materials, Inc. v. Michigan Brick, Inc., Cadillac Brick Co., and Century Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. Basicomputer Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. Raimonde v. Van VlerahOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Cox v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. Chicago Title Insurance v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Kendall Holdings, Ltd. v. Eden Cryogenics LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
  4. Clt Logistics v. River West BrandsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  5. Chicago Title Insurance Corporation v. James A. MagnusonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API