Rogers v. Runfola & Associates, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The primary issue we are asked to decide is whether the covenants not to compete contained within appellees’ employment contracts are reasonable in light of the guidelines pronounced by this court in Raimonde v. Van Vlerah (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 21, 71 O.O. 2d 12, 325 N.E. 2d 544.
I
As a threshold matter, we note that appellees, pursuant to their cross-appeal, suggest that the court of appeals erred in finding their employment contracts valid. One of appellees’ arguments is that the employment contract between Rogers and Runfola is invalid because there was insufficient consideration to support…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Raimonde v. Van VlerahOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Corroon & Black of Illinois, Inc. v. MagnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Mail-Well Envelope Company v. SaleyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Premix, Inc. v. ZappitelliDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
- Pestel Milk Co. v. Model Dairy Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Basicomputer Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lake Land Employment Group of Akron, LLC v. ColumberOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Raasch v. NCR Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Union Home Mortg. Corp. v. Erik CromerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.