Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Monterey Village Associates Ltd. Partnership

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 31, 1989No. 6267PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from a postjudgment decision of the trial court denying their motions for attorney’s fees and costs under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act.

The plaintiffs, three tenants residing in Monterey Village, an apartment complex in Norwalk, brought a class action under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a through § 42-110q, on behalf of some 150 tenant families residing at the complex. In their complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant owner and operator of the complex was attempting to evict them and members of their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Gill v. Petrazzuoli Bros.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  3. Albert Mendel & Son, Inc. v. KroghConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jacques All Trades Corp. v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Suarez v. SordoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Chambers v. ManningDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
  4. Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  5. Hernandez v. Monterey Village Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API