Legal Opinion
Suarez v. Sordo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 17, 1996No. 14840PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The defendants, Alexander J. Sordo and Fred Argilagos, appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, James Suarez, after a jury trial. The jury found for the plaintiff on count one, sounding in negligence, and awarded damages in the amount of $94,000. It also found for the plaintiff on count two under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., and the trial court awarded attorney’s fees. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) denied their motion for a directed verdict, their motions to set aside the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Abrahams v. Young & Rubicam, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Medcalf v. Washington Heights Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Par Painting, Inc. v. Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Mips v. Becon, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.