Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 12, 1991No. 9006PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendants1 appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff on both the plaintiffs complaint and the defendants’ counterclaim. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) doubled the plaintiff’s damage award, (2) failed to enunciate the appropriate standard of proof in awarding double damages, (3) misconstrued the interaction of the damages provisions of General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), and General Statutes § 47a-46, the entry and detainer act, (4) awarded damages in excess of the valu*126ations the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Virgo v. LyonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kavarco v. T. J. E., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Daddona v. Liberty Mobile Home Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Jacques All Trades Corp. v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Kaczynski v. KaczynskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Boulevard Associates v. Sovereign Hotels, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Fabri v. UNITED TECHS. INT'L., INC.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.