Legal Opinion

Glantz v. City of South Bend

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1886No. 12,526PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Erom the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was a suit by appellant, Mary Glantz, against appellee to recover damages for personal injuries received by her while travelling on Washington street within such city, and using all due care; which street appellee was bound to keep in repair, but had negligently suffered the same to be out of repair.

Appellee answered by a general denial of appellant’s complaint. The issues joined were tried by a jury, and, at appellee’s request, the jury returned into court their special verdict, on all the issues in the cause, as follows:

“We, the jury, find that, on April 5th, 1885, at 7 o’clock p. M.,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. City of Logansport v. DickIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Bosseker v. CramerIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Graham v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Ex parte WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API