Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Swander

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1889No. 13,889PublishedCited by 44 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.

— This was an action in partition to quiet title and for an accounting.

The appellee Swander was the plaintiff below; the appellee Smaltz was one of the defendants, as was the appellant; there was another defendant, Henry H. Fisher, who was defaulted.

Mrs. Smaltz filed a cross-complaint, substantially the same in its averments as the complaint.

The appellant filed a cross-complaint, averring that he was the owner of the whole of the real estate, and asking that his title be quieted.

Issue was joined upon the complaint and each of the cross-complaints, and the cause submitted to the court, with a…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. McNutt v. McNuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Roots v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Smurr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Heilman v. HeilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lillie v. TrentmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ryason v. DuntenIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Skinner v. SpannIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Cargar v. FeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API