Legal Opinion

Standard Iron Works v. ArcelorMittal

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 12, 2009No. 08 C 5214PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES B. ZAGEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Standard Iron Works, a direct purchaser of steel, has alleged, on behalf of itself and all others who purchased steel products directly from Defendants between January 1, 2005 and the present, a multi-year antitrust conspiracy amongst Defendant domestic steel producers to reduce the production of steel products in the United States in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § l. 1 Specifically, Plaintiffs collectively allege that on at least three occasions during the class period — mid-2005, late-2006, and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re Potash Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  2. In Re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. In Re Plasma-Derivative Protein Therapies Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  4. In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  5. In Re Delta/Airtran Baggage Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API