Panama R. Co. v. Strobel
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Circuit Judge.
The defendant in error, Strobel, brought suit in the District Court of the Canal Zone against the Panama Railroad Company to recover for injuries received from the derailment of a train upon which he was traveling as a guard, under orders of his superior officers. He was not an employee of the railroad company, but of the United States, and was guarding a coach entirely occupied by convicts, who were being transported on said railroad. The wrecked train was made up of an engine, two refrigerator cars, five second-class passenger coaches, a baggage car, four first-class…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gleeson v. Virginia Midland RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. EdmissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Panama R. Co. v. MinnixCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. PetrocelliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Ramsdell v. GoumisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Manhattan Oil Co. v. MosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Gibbs v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1950
- National Housing Agency v. OrtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- White v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1948
- Marine v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.