Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 29, 1950No. 25255, 25263-25265, 25287, 25303, 25344PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

These seven consolidated cases are actions in tort against the United States. All of the libelants were shoreside civilian employees of the United States. On November 19, 1946, they were engaged in repairing the United States Aircraft Carrier Antietam, at San Francisco Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point. An explosion occurred and the libelants all suffered injuries.

Heretofore Judge Harris of this court decided that the actions could proceed under the Public Vessels Act, 43 Stat. 1112, 46 U.S.C.A. 781 et seq. When the cases were called for trial, the Court, with the consent…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Dahn v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Zinnel v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mandel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. Gerardo v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951
  3. Kirk v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1954
  4. Vatuone v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1950
  5. Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API