Panama R. Co. v. Minnix
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Circuit Judge.
The defendant in error, Minnix, was employed by the Panama Railroad Company (hereinafter styled railroad) as a stevedore foreman to superintend a gang engaged in coaling vessels. He had been employed only a day or two, and was still under the general direction of an experienced foreman. He was working underneath a conveyor, wliich carried coal to a shute. The railroad had other conveyors, which were guarded by upright planks within which they ran, and which prevent lumps of coal from falling from such conveyors. This conveyor was not so guarded. Minnix claimed he was not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. StrangSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hines v. DahnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Louisville & N. R. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Posey v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Icenogle v. Olympic AirwaysDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- Porter v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n of St. LouisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946
- Casper v. Regional Agricultural Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.