Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Petrocelli
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of tlie Southern District of California; Oscar A. Trippet, Judge- Action by Saverio di Giovanni Petrocelli, as administrator of the estate of Pietro Spina, sometimes known as Peter Spino, deceased, against Miller & Lux, Incorporated. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought to recover damages growing out of the death of one Pietro Spina, sometimes known as Peter Spino, who was at the time in question employed by the plaintiff in error (defendant in the trial court) engaged in driving a team of 32 mules hitched to a large grain harvester on the Midway ranch of the plaintiff in error, in Merced county, Cal., on which harvester were also employed at the time four other men, named, respectively, Knight, Trainor, Albano, and Salapi, the latter working the header with a wheel, Trainor being the. sack sewer, and Knight…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Phelps v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Faust v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Arizona & N. M. Ry. Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- Mountain Copper Co. v. Van BurenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
- Western Union Tel. Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rumely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Central R. Co. of New Jersey v. SharkeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Stultz v. CousinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Joyce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Panama R. Co. v. StrobelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.