Legal Opinion
Eistrat v. Humiston
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 1954No. Civ. 20395PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order denying his motion for change of venue. There is also a purported appeal from the order of the trial court denying his motion to dismiss.
I
The order denying the motion for change of venue.
June 3, 1953, plaintiff filed an action in the superior court of Los Angeles County to recover on a promissory note in the amount of $30,000. At the timé plaintiff filed the action there was pending in the Superior Court of Tulare County an action by plaintiff against defendant in respect to a timber contract for which the note of $30,000 was the major…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cook v. PendergastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Noland v. NolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Parker v. OwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
3Cited by5 opinions
- Samuel v. Stevedoring Services of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Los Angeles City Sch Dist v. Redwood Empire Title Co. of Mendocino Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Gaalen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Anderson v. No-DozCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Peterson Tractor Co. v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960