Legal Opinion

Anderson v. No-Doz

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1955No. Civ. 20686PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order granting defendant’s motion for a change of venue from the county of Los Angeles to the city and county of San Francisco. He contends the order should be reversed because the affidavit in support of the motion was not sufficient as an affidavit of merits as required by section 396b of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The action is one for damages for personal injuries sus famed in an accident which occurred in the county of Monterey. The motion was made on the ground that at the time of the commencement of the action defendant was a resident of the city…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nickerson v. California Raisin Co.California Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Rey v. BarclayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Nanny v. Ruby Lighting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. People ex rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. LarueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Westover v. BridgfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Los Angeles City Sch Dist v. Redwood Empire Title Co. of Mendocino Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Mark Briggs & Associates, Inc. v. Kinestar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Peterson Tractor Co. v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API