Legal Opinion

Wadleigh v. Phelps

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1905No. Sac. No. 1155PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Nevada County refusing to change the place of trial. P. T. Nilón, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a change of place of trial from Nevada County to San Mateo County. The action was begun in Nevada County, and the motion was made upon two grounds: 1. 'That Nevada County was not the proper county for the trial, because of the fact that the defendant resided in the county of San Mateo; and 2. That the convenience of witnesses would be promoted by a change of the place of trial to San Mateo County.

1. With reference "to the first ground, the motion was properly denied because of the fact that it was made too late. The original…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. PendergastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. O'Hanion v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Danielson v. DanielsonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Mono Power Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API