Legal Opinion

Arroyo Ditch & Water Co. v. Baldwin

California Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1909No. L.A. No. 2039PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

This ease comes up on an appeal from the order denying defendant Baldwin’s motion for a new trial, the appeal from the judgment having been heretofore dismissed. The action was brought by the Arroyo Ditch and Water Company (a corporation), to quiet in itself and in the defendants other than E. J. Baldwin, as against said Baldwin, the title to the waters of the Old San Gabriel River and to all the water which in its natural course flows in said river above the point known as the Arroyo Ditch dam, except a certain proportion of said water which was conceded to belong to Baldwin. Plaintiff also…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Holmes v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Simon Newman Co. v. LassingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Coburn v. California Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Gallaher v. Montecito Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Department of Ecology v. AcquavellaWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. California Pastoral & Agriculture Co. v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Montezuma Canal Co. v. Smithville Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Pyramid Land & Stock Co. v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API