Legal Opinion

California Pastoral & Agriculture Co. v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1914No. Sac. No. 1901PublishedCited by 25 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment and order denying a new trial, in an action brought by them to obtain a judgment determining the right of defendant, if any, to divert waters from Fresno River at points above the lands of plaintiffs, which are riparian to said river, and enjoining the diversion of any greater amount than that determined by such judgment to belong to defendant.

The defendant is a corporation incorporated about December 8, 1888, and ever since its incorporation it has been continuously engaged in the business, for which it was organized, “of acquiring, disposing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Leavitt v. Lassen Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Farmers' Co-Operative Ditch Co. v. Riverside Irrigation District, Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  5. Washington State Sugar Co. v. GoodrichIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API