Pyramid Land & Stock Co. v. Scott
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This action was brought by plaintiffs to quiet their title as against defendants to the water of Long Valley Creek, a creek flowing northerly through the lands of all of the plaintiffs and defendants and thence into Honey Lake, in Lassen County, California.
Plaintiffs in their complaint claim as appropriators and as riparian proprietors. Defendants claim as appropriators and as riparian proprietors and by amendment to their answer claim prescriptive rights.
The court found that defendant Scott had an adverse right to 90 inches- of the waters of the creek and defend ants Galeppi liad an adverse…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- Wood v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Shonafelt v. BusathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Costello v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Crain v. HoeflingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.