Legal Opinion
State v. Brooke
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 2007No. 2006-0015PublishedCited by 145 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} We accepted this discretionary appeal to determine the significance of written waivers of the right to counsel and to clarify when uncounseled misdemeanor convictions may be used to enhance penalties for later offenses under R.C. 4511.19.
Case Procedure
{¶ 2} On January 14, 2002, defendant-appellee, Betsy Brooke, was indicted for two DUI offenses:- driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1) (now (A)(1)(a)), and driving with a prohibited concentration of alcohol in bodily substances, in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(2) (now (A)(1)(b)), offenses that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re C.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. NobleOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Hand (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.