Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1987No. 86-1115PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The sole question before this court is whether the existence of a prior conviction is an essential element of the offense where that previous conviction affects only the penalty and does not enhance the degree of the offense itself. We hold that in such a case, the prior conviction is not an element of the offense.

Appellant argues that Ohio case law holds that where the penalty for a particular crime is enhanced by virtue of a prior conviction of the same offense, the prior offense is an essential element of the subsequent offense, and must be charged in the indictment and proved by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. GordonOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. CichyOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. State v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. ZuernOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. BrookeOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2000

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API