Legal Opinion

Otto Seidenberg, Inc. v. Tautfest

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

The plaintiff corporation, engaged in the business of buying hops, commenced this suit to foreclose liens on two hop crops produced by the defendant Tautfest. The liens accrued by reason of advances made by plaintiff to the grower for the purpose of cultivating and harvesting the hops contracted to be delivered.

On June 13, 1932, the plaintiff and said defendant entered into a contract by the terms of which the defendant agreed to sell to the plaintiff 60,000 pounds of hops to be grown on certain described land, in each of the years from 1933 to 1937, inclusive. The contract stipuláted the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ontario Deciduous Fruit Growers' Ass'n v. Cutting Fruit Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Call v. LinnOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Livesley v. StraussOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Lachmund v. Lope SingOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wigan v. FollettOregon Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bembridge v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hugo v. Loewi, Inc. v. GeschwillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  3. Finchum v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API