Ontario Deciduous Fruit Growers' Ass'n v. Cutting Fruit Packing Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This action was brought to recover the price of certain peaches sold and delivered under a contract in writing. The defendant set up as a defense non-compliance of plaintiff with the contract, and. also a counterclaim on account of damages arising out. of such non-compliancé. The plaintiff had judgment, from which and from an order denying a new trial the defendant appeals.
The contract between the parties contains the following stipulations: “Seller has this d¡ay sold and agrees to deliver to buyer, f. o. b. cars at South Cucamonga, and buyer has bought and agrees to receive from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dexter v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Clark v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by24 opinions
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Berg v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Gardiner v. McDonoghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Sanchez v. YorbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Barkemeyer Grain & Seed Co. v. HannantMontana Supreme Court · 1923
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.