Legal Opinion

Finchum v. Lyons

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, j.

This is the second time this action by plaintiff Finchum to recover for seed potatoes grown for the defendant Fiorovich has been here on appeal. On the first appeal we reversed a judgment for plaintiff and remanded the case for a new trial, Finchum v. Lyons, 247 Or 255, 428 P2d 890 (1967). The second trial also resulted in a judgment for plaintiff and defendant Fiorovich again appeals.

The case is governed by the provisions of the Uniform Sales Act, which has since been repealed. Although there are several assignments of error only two of them are worthy of extended consideration.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Livesley v. Krebs Hop Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Finchum v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Allan v. Oceanside Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Wigan v. FollettOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Crosland v. SloanOregon Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hansen v. BussmanOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wynn v. SundquistOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Cramer v. MengerhausenOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Jitner v. Gersch Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Thomas T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API