Legal Opinion
Harrell v. Harder
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 11, 1974No. Civ. 13800PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM INJUNCTION
BLUMENFELD, Chief Judge.
This case, which began several years ago as a straight-forward effort to implement the Supreme Court’s decision in Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 90 S.Ct. 1011, 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970), has proven as difficult to dispose of as the legendary Hydra, provoking new issues as fast as old ones are resolved. 1
The defendant’s successor in office, Nicholas Norton, has now moved for additional relief, pursuant to- Rule 60(b)(5) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, from the order dated September 17, 1971, and the ruling dated…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Feld v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Smith v. SmithDelaware Family Court · 1983
- Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Hurley v. ToiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Cardinale v. MathewsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.