Legal Opinion

Cardinale v. Mathews

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 26, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-930PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM B. JONES, Chief Judge.

This case involves, as did another case recently before this Court, the requirements of procedural due process in the context of Title XVI of the Social Security Act (Supplemental Security Income Program). See Hannington v. Weinberger, 393 F.Supp. 553 (D.D.C.1975). Plaintiffs in this action attack three exceptions to the general rule contained in defendant’s regulations that Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits are not to be reduced, suspended, or terminated without prior notice and some opportunity to challenge the proposed change in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Claudia Frost v. Caspar Weinberger, as Secretary of United States Department of Health,education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Wheeler v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Budnicki v. BealDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Turner Ex Rel. Turner v. WalshDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1977
  3. Klein v. MathewsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1977
  4. Willis v. LascarisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1980
  5. Shannon v. United States Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API