Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Delaware Family Court

Decided March 14, 1983PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAKEFIELD, Judge.

Pursuant to Superior Court Rule 60(b), Respondent-Wife (Wife) has moved to reopen this Court’s decision of November 30, 1981 for the purpose of admitting additional evidence and for consideration of additional arguments with respect to the ancillary matters decided therein. Specifically, the Wife asks that the Court now treat the Husband’s military pension as a marital asset in view of the recently-enacted Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Law, Public Law 97-252 passed by Congress and signed by the President on September 8, 1982 and now codified in 10 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Robert C. S. v. Barbara J. S.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. Gloria Theriault v. David E. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  4. Griffin v. State Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1969
  5. McGrath Atty. Gen. v. Potash. McGrath Atty. Gen. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bullock v. BullockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Marriage of GalloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. In Re the Marriage of FlannaganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Castiglioni v. CastiglioniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API