Legal Opinion

Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1984No. 17561-PRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Vice Chief Justice:

Petitioner Philip Edsall and respondent Ruth Edsall were married on September 25, 1959. At that time Phil was a member of the United States Air Force and continued on active duty during the marriage. Phil and Ruth were divorced in 1981. A separation agreement was entered into between the parties and incorporated into the decree of dissolution entered on December 7, 1981. The agreement provided that respondent was not entitled to any of the military retirement pension that petitioner would eventually receive from the government. This agreement was consistent in that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Mary Frances Erspan, Cross-Appellant v. Lloyd J. Badgett, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Neal v. NealArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Webb v. EricksonArizona Supreme Court · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. In Re the Marriage of FlannaganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Butcher v. ButcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Bobrow v. BobrowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. Major v. MajorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API